Consumer Report Infant Car Seat

Consumer Report Infant Car Seat

We're also retesting the infant car seats featured in our article as thoroughly and quickly as possible, so that we can publish our findings and help parents who are making this important buying decision. .

Mail (will not be published) (required) Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. The reason? CR claimed that 10 of 12 infant carseats are not safe, and actually recommended the recall of one particular carseat. " The group's latest news release says that new information from great hollow middle school the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration puts the accuracy of the side-impact portion of the crash tests into question. 5 mph conditions claimed by Consumer Reports, the seats stayed in their bases as they should, instead of failing dramatically," Nason said.

But most cars are also tested in a 35-mph frontal crash and in a 38-mph side crash. Sign Up Now!Consumer Reports Recalls Controversial Infant Car Seat StudyConsumers Union, publisher of Consumer Reports village candle winter wonderland magazine, recalled its recent study on infant car seats pending further testing and review of the controversial findings.

Sincerely, FREE NewsletterSign-up for our FREE updates delivered by email.
I urge parents to remember that using your baby's car seat properly is the best way to keep your baby safe on the road.
Thursday January 18, 2007 comments (0) Display Latest Headlines Read Archives Cute Baby Clothes: LaFolie Knit HatsMainGraco High Chairs, Bright Starts Teethers Recalled Ideas for Family TravelTake a Family CruisePlan a Trip to Disney WorldGo on a Family AdventurePopular Vacation SpotsSkiing with the Family What's HotBaby Food RecallsAngel Alert ReviewStrollers Under \$250High-Back Booster Seats3 Year Old Toys and Gifts Most PopularBaby's First ChristmasToys for One-Year-Old BabiesBest Convertible Car SeatsTop Lightweight Baby StrollersBest Toys for 2 Year Olds All Topics Email Article Print this Page . Comments are moderated according to our moderation policy. / show comments » « hide comments I was going to ask you if you’d seen this, and if it was behind the paywall, well Posted on January 5, 2007 at 9:02 pm Thanks for the heads up.
. The report, released earlier this month, suggested that only two of the infant car seats tested passed the group's business ebay own start proprietary crash testing and could therefore be called safe. Posted on January 5, 2007 at 10:41 pm You’d be interested in the take of the Freakonomics authors on it: Posted on January 5, 2007 at 10:51 pm And their more recent post, responding to the consumer reports article: Posted on January 5, 2007 at 10:52 pm I had seen the first Freakonomics post, but not the second.

We always strive to be accurate and fair, and I regret this error. But upon reevaluating our data, we believe our tests simulated crashes that were much more severe than that. I find their analysis interesting but not enough to draw a conclusion from.
I've directed that we suspend the article's Ratings and other recommendations regarding specific car-seat models until this retesting is completed.
orgA message to our readers By now, you've probably heard the news about my decision to withdraw the infant car seat report featured on ConsumerReports. " Nason said Consumers Union's side-impact crash tests were conducted at a speed that was nearly twice what the group claimed. Granted, I may be a bit biased here, but if you’ve not tested your solution, you can’t claim much of anything about it. This enables us to inform you about the safety, reliability, and performance of important products that we couldn't otherwise test. In addition, they found problems with some seats and cars’ LATCH system for securing car seats.

I saw an ad recently that the ‘magic’ height is 4′9″ for no booster/car seat. In a news release on the NHTSA website, NHTSA administrator Nicole rogers commodity fundcommodity funds Nason said the agency's "initial review of the Consumer Reports testing procedures showed a significant error in the manner in which it conducted and reported on its side-impact tests. ” Posted on January 5, 2007 at 11:35 pm I think the Levitt is simply taking the traditional economist’s view, which is if the extra expenditure black bride list russian doesn’t provide value, it is a waste and could be re-directed.

While the vast majority of product testing by Consumers Union occurs in our own labs, we sometimes use outside contractors that have special test equipment naval station great lake il or other expertise that we don't. What they’ve done is highlight a potential problem, but their “solution” is wholly untested. . The board of directors and I are appointing a panel of experts to review this incident and determine what went wrong. Here's what I know so far: One of our tests was intended to simulate how infant car seats perform in a side-impact crash at 38 mph.

That's the speed at which many new vehicles are tested in side crashes by the government's auto safety agency. For them, a car seat represents the best practical way to ride securely, and it is certainly an improvement over the days infant bowel problemweather report of riding shotgun on mom’s lap. What the hell? Most test engineers I know live to break stuff and bust up people’s hypotheses. Sometimes comments are delayed by our spam filter.

We test more than 3,000 products each year, and errors like this one are rare. That said, we expect all our testing to meet the same high standards, and our own staff oversees all projects. Going forward, I want to make sure that our actions are as thorough and transparent as possible so that we preserve your trust as we continue to test, inform, and protect consumers.
The punchline: of the twelve seats they tested, only the Baby Trend Flex-Loc and the Graco SnugRide with EPS performed adequately. In any case, I again stress the importance of what we say in the article: Any child car seat is better than no seat at all.
I am bemused that their latest response was entitled, “We Are Not the Only Ones Who Think Child Car Seats Don’t Work Well” whereas their earlier claims boiled down to “specially modified seat belts (which do not currently exist) would work as well as car seats.

. Posted on January 7, 2007 at 12:02 pm Consumer reports has recalled that study and will release a new report sometime. Consumer Reports plans to re-release their study after corrections are made. Though several car seat safety organizations expressed concerns and disagreement over Consumer Reports' findings, the news coverage of the report sparked panic in parents whose children are riding in infant car seats, and sales skyrocketed for the two seats deemed safe in the report. I’m guessing my daughter will be there in another year or so. These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.